RBV: II Peter 3:16

This essay first appeared in the CGG Weekly as “Putting Out Flawed Study Practices,” on May 30, 2003.

“. . . as also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things, in which are some things hard to understand, which those who are untaught and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do the rest of the Scriptures.”
—II Peter 3:16

As managing editor of Forerunner magazine, I occasionally receive unsolicited articles from readers who want their work published. The articles are often substandard and sometimes even doctrinally wrong, but initially, I give them the benefit of the doubt and peruse their offerings.

Recently, I received an article on disfellowshipping from a person not in our church. We believe God gives the church the authority to disfellowship or excommunicate a member who is habitually committing sin or is a danger to the congregation (Matthew 18:17; Romans 16:17-18; I Corinthians 5:1-5, 9-13; II Thessalonians 3:6, 14; Titus 3:10-11). Every private association possesses power of this sort. For instance, the Boy Scouts of America has the right as a private group to dismiss a scoutmaster if he does not meet its stated qualifications. While this authority to dismiss members is assumed by private groups in America, the church has it by direct command from the Word of God.

The fundamental reasons for using the authority to disfellowship are to protect the church and to convey to the disfellowshipped person the seriousness of his misconduct. It is, in a sense, spiritual quarantine. The sinning member is separated from the rest of the congregation so he will not “infect” them, and he is given time and space to deal seriously with his problem.

Disfellowshipping does not—indeed cannot—take away a person’s salvation; it does not consign him to the Lake of Fire. Jesus Christ is the Judge (John 5:22; Acts 17:31; II Timothy 4:8), not any minister or church council. All disfellowshipping does is exclude the rebellious member from fellowship with the church. However, if he does not repent and continues in his sinful practices, he is indeed in danger of the second death (Revelation 20:14-15; see Hebrews 6:4-8; 10:26-31).

The author of the article I received on this subject, however, is unmistakably antagonistic to this practice, and he goes to great lengths to “prove” from Scripture that it should not be used. He begins by spiritualizing the perverse sexual relationship Paul condemns in I Corinthians 5, saying that the Bible is a “coded book,” and when we decode this section, the apostle is really writing about getting involved in politics!

The author continues through several other points, pulling various verses out of context to support his plainly emotionally motivated assault on this doctrine. Peter warns us to treat Paul’s epistles carefully, “. . . in which are some things hard to understand, which those who are untaught and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do the rest of the Scriptures” (II Peter 3:16).

The article’s author does this with I Corinthians 5:11: “But now I have written to you not to keep company with anyone named a brother, who is a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or an extortioner—not even to eat with such a person.” The apostle’s meaning here is plain, but within a paragraph or two, the author of the article concludes that Paul is saying that the church has no authority to disfellowship one of its own! However, in verse 13, Paul quotes Deuteronomy 17:17 to back up his decision: “Therefore ‘put away from yourselves that wicked person.'” And this is a section of Paul’s writing that is not “hard to understand”!

This should sound a warning to those of us who study the Bible. There are proper ways to determine what it teaches, and there are downright improper and dishonest ways. We see several of the latter in this example:

• First, our attitude must be that of a seeker of truth, not one of trying to prove a point.
• Second, the context of a verse is vital to its meaning, and we abuse the teaching when we cut it from that context and paste it into another.
• Third, spiritualizing a scripture at the expense of its plain meaning over-complicates matters and increases the possibility of error.
• Fourth, no one scripture will hold all the truth about a doctrine; one must gather together all the biblical material on a subject to determine God’s teaching.
• Fifth, understanding the Greek or Hebrew meanings of words is fine, but no word’s definition is enough to formulate a doctrine.

These are just a few of the principles of Bible Study we should follow in coming to understand the way of life God has called us to. We have a lifetime of study, contemplation, and prayer to learn and grow in it. We might as well do it correctly!